Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thanks so much for joining us. I\u2019m Daniel Estulin and welcome to Estulim.Media. So for decades, we\u2019ve been taught to understand the world through a familiar lens. We follow elections, wars, economic crisis, diplomatic smits, the rise and fall of political leaders. And so every day, we\u2019re told who won, who lost to gain political influence, who is in decline. But what if those are not the real or it\u2019s not the real story? What if these events are merely the visible surface of a much larger, much deeper transformation, one that is reshaping the very foundation of the international system. Because today\u2019s world is undergoing one of the most profound transitions since the end of World War Two, the institutions that defined post 1945 order are under unprecedented pressure. The balance between military power, financial power, Technological power is shifting before our eyes. Artificial intelligence is becoming a strategic asset for financial markets increasingly influence government. Silicon Valley is moving even closer to Washington. The Middle East is being reorganized. Europe is searching for a new identity. And so beneath it all lies a fundamental question who will shape the architecture of the next world order? And so to explore these questions, I\u2019m joined by someone who spent years analyzing the intersection of finance, geopolitics, technology from a perspective that often challenges conventional thinking.<\/p>\n
Simon Dixon is one of the world\u2019s best known macro investors and financial analysts. And over the years I\u2019ve been following for many, many years, he has developed a framework that connects monetary policy, sovereign debt, capital markets, and official intelligence Bitcoin geopolitical strategy into this kind of a single analytical model. Whether you agree with all of his and our conclusions or not, his work forces us to ask deeper questions about how power actually works in the 21st century. So today we\u2019re going to move beyond the headlines. We\u2019re not here to debate personalities or daily political events. I couldn\u2019t care less about that. Instead, we will examine the structures that shape those events because in the post world, international order, , it\u2019s, it\u2019s obviously coming to an end. That\u2019s one of the questions we\u2019re going to discuss. Is military power giving way to technological power? Has Europe entered a period of managed decline? What role will Donald Trp play in America\u2019s transformation? Is the Middle East becoming the center of a new geopolitical architecture? And perhaps the most important question of all, what does all of this mean for the future of our civilization? Simon, thanks so much for your time. Welcome back to our show. It\u2019s a pleasure to have you with us again.<\/p>\n
All right. Thank you so much for having me. Yeah, I think it\u2019s worth, kind of shaping a bit of the world as we were used to. So, you know, we were we were really understand the world in terms of a nation state, being a power with a competing power or a rising power and those nation states tend to find, you know, they tend to fight military battles, financial warfare or technical supremacy, , depending on what the technology is now it\u2019s AI and robotics. , previously it was, you know, farming or some kind of technology around something that would fundamentally change and give a competitive edge. In the case of the British and the Dutch empires, which were the previous two empires, it was naval fleets and it was financial engineering. And so the Dutch Empire, they created a structure one was the Amsterdam Central Bank, whose job was to socialize losses and privatize gains. A government whose job was to take on the debt through the bond market. And a private limited company called the Dutch East India Company, whose job was to privatize all the profits. And so you had the government take on the debt and the company take on the profits and the central bank was the vehicle for obfuscating that reality through fiat currencies. Now, in the Dutch Empire, the Dutch guilder was backed by gold.<\/p>\n
And so there was an inbuilt mechanism for holding back, you know, money printing to make sure it doesn\u2019t destroy your value that was the Dutch Empire. And they built the largest naval fleet in the world. And then they outsourced the labor to the Brits and then the Brits built the, the replicated the whole structure but this time they created the Bank of England, the British East India Company and the UK government, built the largest naval fleet so that the British East India Company could steal the world\u2019s resources use it for the profits of the British Empire and build a global colony, when they bankrupted the UK government and they were unable to exert force because the colonies got too complicated, there was a managed transition over to the American Empire, this time the American Empire had significant resources itself. And so the Europeans, colonized and took over the land genocided the ethnics and locals and then you ended up with a new class of people that resisted against the Brits, but really, was it sovereign autonomous control Or was it actually the financial layers that controlled the Dutch Empire? The British Empire also ended up controlling the American Empire after their independence, and we\u2019re about to celebrate, you know, the 250 years.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s talk about Europe and the control dismantling of the continent. I don\u2019t want to ask you about whether Europe is in decline. I think that\u2019s that\u2019s obvious to everyone. But I want to understand is something much deeper. Is Europe simply failing or is it being systematically restructured? In other words, are we witnessing collapse, or are we witnessing a controlled dismantling or demolition of the post-war European model?<\/p>\n
Yeah. So if you look at those Dutch, British, American, you hit a phase where the currency can no longer sustain what I call the heightened asset stripping phase, and so once you\u2019ve loaded up the government with so much debt and your bank effectively not quite bankrupted it, but you get it ready for a debt restructuring, you then need to, you know, move on and you continue to strip assets. So financial power continues to strip assets. So if you look at the Dutch Empire, even today, they\u2019re at the final stage of asset stripping after all these centuries, because now they\u2019re even implementing unrealized taxes, as I speak. Yeah. And so unrealized taxes is where all of the wealthy people leave that have the assets that decreases the tax revenue, those that are suffering from inflation end up having to sell their assets. Plus, if you can\u2019t get them to sell their assets, you charge tax on it where they have to either do two things. They either have to borrow against their asset, in which case they take on more debt, asse more debt. With this financial industrial complex or, or they end up selling the assets that crashes the assets so that transnational capital can sweep up the assets with private equity, or they can refinance your debt and, and send you deeper into debt. And that\u2019s kind of like the final stage of asset stripping, as it were. If you look at the Brits, you put them through decades and decades of the average interest on their debt is higher than the growth rate of the country.<\/p>\n
That means you\u2019re becoming more and more subordinate to financial, you\u2019re borrowing more and more from bond holders. And when you borrow more and more from bond holders, bond holders have more political control over the government through lobby And then they can redirect the capital into the stock market. And so you end up with the stock market running away from the economy. That\u2019s the situation with Britain right now. So the Dutch empire is being asset stripped in the final stage. The British Empire is just about to go through its IMF bailout, austerity, reduction of benefits, civil unrest campaign and the American empire is kind of further along that cycle. They\u2019re at the stage where they\u2019re taking all of the debt, which is the bond market, pushing all of it into the stock markets. You\u2019re getting massive stock market valuations, massive wealth concentration and then, you then eventually go to later the asset stripping, but what you do is you set up a new empire in the meantime. So what does that empire look like? You know, three things very briefly. And we can dive wherever you want. One of them is you concentrate power in your sphere of influence, which is Europe. And so you slowly asset strip Europe into the US stock market and various other stock markets, the other thing you do is you use what assets you have left in order to negotiate leverage into the new world order.<\/p>\n
And you take your capital markets and you slowly exert capital out in line with the new empire. And so what we\u2019re looking at right now is the complete hollowing out of Europe and asset stripping it into the, the stock market, then you\u2019ve got a transition to set up multi-polar spheres of influence. And at the same time, knowing that this can create a lot of civil unrest because there\u2019s not a natural progression. The Europeans and the Americans always had this natural progression where they were able to coordinate. In a multi-polar world, you have competing factions of power, you know, whether it be China, which is a nationalist government, or whether it be, you know, energy companies that have managed to preserve their sovereign wealth into a sovereign wealth fund. Energy countries rather, these are competing factions of power. So you try to use the assets that you have, aI, robotics, military power, financial capital and build influence globally in, into a multi-polar world. So, and then you negotiate this one what, what I think the technology is trying to do is recognizing, okay, China, you are the rising power, America, we\u2019re private asset stripped we got the whole west into the stock market and let\u2019s build one global AI technocratic control grid and digital control grid and divvy up the world into multipolarity controlled by one control, technocratic, kind of privatized partnership with the Chinese Communist Party.<\/p>\n
So let me ask you this. The speaking of the financial dimension, you are one of the few people actually who argues that financial markets ultimately discipline governments. So is Europe increasingly governed through debt markets rather than democratic politics? Has sovereign debt, in other words, become the mechanism through which national sovereignty is quietly transferred elsewhere?<\/p>\n
Yeah. So when I think of power and when I look through these empires, you know, from Dutch, British to American, you\u2019ll notice that the dominant force, the dominant power in a capitalist economy and this is not the traditional definition of capitalism because capitalism would require a free market where capital competes. When you have a central bank that determines the price of capital, then you don\u2019t have capitalism, and when you have a government that can asse the debt, what you end up with is socialism for the wealthy because they get bailed out, socialize the losses, and privatize the gains and capitalism for the poor. They have to compete, but they can\u2019t compete because They get the highest interest rate. If you think of you\u2019re at the bottom of the chain, and you\u2019re on payday loans and credit cards to survive, you\u2019re paying the highest interest rate. Whereas if you\u2019re a bank, you\u2019re actually creating money every time you issue a loan, so you actually get free money. And so if you go along that spectrum, you\u2019ve got companies, the larger the company, like say Apple, they can borrow on the debt capital markets at a cheaper rate, a country, and then a country like America, if you want to borrow for a month, then you pay a lower interest rate.<\/p>\n
If you want to borrow for 30 years, then you\u2019re paying a higher interest rate. So, you know, but when that is determined via a central bank, then you no longer have capitalism. And so we have this distorted reality. But in effect, individuals are controlled by their access to capital and the interest on their debt. , which is what determines whether they can use that debt in order to invest in assets. And then those assets outperform the money printing and the inflation. And if you get that wrong, if you use your debt in order to conse and purchase goods, then you just end up getting poorer and poorer and poorer as the rich get richer and richer and richer. And then all the assets at the end of the cycle where we are in America right now, you have like 92% of stock market value, which are held by 10% of institutions and wealthy individuals. , and so capital is what determines. And you can look at that. That\u2019s at the individual level, you know, it\u2019s mortgages, credit cards, everything. Then you look at the corporate level, you know, your ability to go public, sell your shares gives you access to debt capital markets. , and so debt is a subordination vehicle and then that the sovereign country level, the bond holders dictate, you know, the bond vigilantes, , they have the ability to destroy your currency to force you to print currency in order to pay your debt price in another currency.<\/p>\n
, or, , they, you know, , they can basically lobby in order to buy the politicians. And so when, when financial power and one things that happens in investment banking, and I used to work in investment banking is you turn all the businesses into products, you load them up with debt, you get voting rights, and then you install your own board. And then the executives now work for you. And so they work for your bonds, your equity, voting rights, , and your board that you install. And so then as this happens, as you take more and more companies public and you subordinate more and more, , companies where their net, their net worth is dependent upon you giving access to capital and defending their share price. , so this, this complex as it were, this financial industrial complex, I call it, , which consists of asset managers, investment banks, private equity, Silicon Valley, you know, , , banks that create fiat currency. , they, they act as a complex. And in my estimation, most governments in the extreme case, you take all Europe, Canada, Australia, US, UK, , they\u2019re the Canada, they\u2019re all subordinate to transnational capital and the, the financial industrial complex.<\/p>\n
Then you\u2019ve got the other extreme, the Chinese Communist Party in China, where capital is now allowed to control the government. And so the. All companies are subordinate to the government and you get more authoritarian type of structure. And then you have a hybrid where a country like Saudi, let\u2019s say, you know, , and even Iran in this case, , they keep their resources, they take those resources and they put it in a sovereign wealth fund. And then they can partner with this financial industrial complex to co-invest. And that buys them influence to try and keep out the fic. And the jackals, I\u2019ll call it fic financial industrial complex from their country. And those are the battles one sovereign country, which is China, a bunch of countries which have sovereign wealth funds which had to co-invest and co op fic in order to keep the jackals out from regime, changing them and taking them over. And then countries which have neoliberal, , globalized financial capital markets, which are fully subordinate to the financial industrial complex and the government\u2019s work for them. Every. Every politician has to go up a ladder of securing capital from the lobby, providing value to the lobby, and then eventually being in a compromised network like Jeffrey Epstein. If you want to go all the way to the top, like Trp.<\/p>\n
Simon, I wanted to ask you a question from a vantage point of where are we? So history offers us many examples of great civilizations that slowly lost economic vitality before losing political influence. Which historical period best resembles Europe today? Are we talking about the late Roman Empire, the decline of Venice, the British Empire after World War Two? Or is today\u2019s transformation historically unprecedented?<\/p>\n
Interesting. , I would just call Europe at this stage a fully subordinate vehicle like that. All of the politicians work for a faction of power. Let\u2019s take UK right now, for example. Sorry. And then I\u2019ll I\u2019ll bring it back.<\/p>\n
Actually, I do want to talk to you about UK. Yeah, we\u2019ll definitely I want to, I want to do a segment on UK and the. Okay and the British royal family.<\/p>\n
Yeah. , but right now, if you look at we\u2019ve had seven regime changes in ten years. We just had another regime change. Let\u2019s just look at the, the not, you know, the so so people.<\/p>\n
Understand sorry to interrupt you so that people who are watching us understand we\u2019re not talking about regime change, , something like gadhafi. We\u2019re talking about one prime minister leaving and someone else comes in in his place. Go ahead.<\/p>\n
Well, I call it regime changes because I think democracies are fake. , I think politicians are selected, not elected, obviously. , and, , so I like to put everything on a fair, , language ground. Even the Federal Reserve was recently regime change with Kevin Warsh by the banks that wanted him in. They pretend it\u2019s Trp, they pretend it\u2019s the politician. The politician is just a battering ram for the public. Their job is to do what their lobby wants them to do. It\u2019s a regime. They\u2019re paid like they\u2019re paid for rent, prostitutes, , for financial power, technical power, big pharma, , you know, military power, whatever, whoever\u2019s willing to pay the most. And their job is to do what they are meant to do for what they were paid to do, but create a narrative that makes them think they work for the people. And slowly, when the people realize that they\u2019re not doing what they elected them for, they get regime changed and someone else is selected and they\u2019re selected based upon how much they\u2019re paid by that lobby. So if you look back at the UK, , you had , let\u2019s start with Boris Johnson. Boris Johnson was there to implement lockdowns and create a narrative that would justify the lockdowns. That was his main purpose for a World Economic For agenda.<\/p>\n
His job was also to Later. , make sure that Russia and Ukraine never sign a peace deal for the military industrial complex. , and get in the way of any thought of peace. . Now, then he was regime changed, so maybe he didn\u2019t serve power or you just keep rolling him over once they serve their agenda and suddenly we get Ex-goldman Sachs guy, , Rishi Sunak. , and, , suddenly you get a shameful exit. So that\u2019s the leverage that they have over the politician, but then they leave and they carry on working for the same power as a private contractor. You know, Tony Blair all this time again, what did Rishi Sunak do where he was through his family office, the larger investor in the company that was producing all the vaccines. And so he was a massive investor in vaccines. So his job was to make sure that everyone, , gets vaccinated. , they make a load of profit. Then later the share price collapses. He leaves in shame. They do a regime change. Suddenly we get Liz Truss. , Liz Truss does a policy that doesn\u2019t make financial sense to the Bank of England. She gets regime changed in a couple of weeks. , and the Bank of England and the bond vigilantes say, no, we\u2019re not going down that path.<\/p>\n
And then suddenly we get Keir Starmer. Who\u2019s Keir Starmer? Well, he was a military contractor. What did what was he involved when he was, he was part of the case of taking down Julian Assange. , that was exposing the Iraq, you know, the Iraq war and all the crimes against hanity, exposing the military industrial complex and all the crimes they commit and the money laundering operations. And so Keir Starmer made him out like he was a sex offender, , and tried to take him down because he was posting all this stuff on Wikileaks, Wikileaks funded by Bitcoin. , and then there was a structure that where were internal whistleblowers in the military that were exposing all these things. , and so now Keir Starmer, what\u2019s his biggest contribution? He just got regime changed. But what was his biggest contribution? It was to pretend that the British people are defending democracy, while the Bank of England prints money, they launder it through to Ukraine. , Ukraine, corrupt politicians that were installed and like Zelensky and installed and manufactured by the CIA. , create a narrative to get Europe to print money, to get America to print money. , and then they siphon it back into Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon, BAE systems, Palantir.<\/p>\n
And they provided a technical integration test bed for integrating drones with artificial intelligence. , and they\u2019ll keep that on until the last Ukrainian. , and they can try and, you know, agitate. There was a CIA op in order to agitate Russia in 2014 when they did the regime change that led to the installation of Zelensky. So all this to say, I think regime is the appropriate word because we don\u2019t have democracies. , if you want to engage in politics, then you need to buy politicians point blank. That\u2019s what Peter Thiel does. He manufactured JD Vance. Look at Trp. He was paid for by Elon Musk. Then the Bank of New York Mellon family, Peter Thiel. And he was also paid for by Mariam Edelsten, which is the Israel stuff. But what about on top of that, there was $5 billion. Affinity partners, venture capital fund to invest in the reconstruction of the Middle East. , and that was managed by Jared Kushner with $2 billion investment from Saudi, , that required going to war with Iran in order to create the destruction that the fund would profit from. , and, , and so then if you want, we can look through his policies. I can tell you who paid for each policy.<\/p>\n
I was actually going to ask you something else because again, you talked about the regime change. You have 6 or 7 regime changes. And I totally agree with you with the terminology in Britain. But my question is, why Britain? Why has it become such an important testing ground? I mean, it could have been another country. It could have been France, it could have been Germany, it could have been Spain or Italy. We see an attempt on regime change in Spain right now. But why did it all start with Britain?<\/p>\n
All of the above. , this same operation. What do you think the European Union was? The European Union was a regime change. It was to centralize with the exception of the Bank of England, all of the currencies into the European Central Bank. So once you\u2019ve got one unified monetary policy, you can slowly remove move to a fiscal policy union through financial crisis, and then you can fix it with a capital market union. And then you have one European stock market. So all of these are concentration of power. Where did the European Union project come from? It came from the Bank for International Settlements.<\/p>\n
Write.<\/p>\n
The Bank for International Settlements that were set up in order to destroy the German economy, manage reparations after World War One so that you could give Germany massive gold debt. And the only way they could pay it is by printing their own currency. So they printed their own currency, , post World War One, in order to pay the gold through these reparations, which led to the Vollmer Republic, which led to such a distressed economy hyperinflationary cycle that it had a nationalist uprising called National Socialism, aka Hitler and Nazism, , which arrested the Rothschilds and created their own monetary policy. , but then was eventually regime changed by the Bank for International Settlements, again leading to the post-World war Two Empire, which was the creation of the IMF and the world Bank. And so the European Union was a construct of this for centralizing. So why England? Well, England, , you know, you had the Dutch Empire that was rolled up into Europe. but the Bank of England maintained its own currency. The reason for that is because City of London is a separate jurisdiction to the UK, and that separate jurisdiction has the one square mile with all these banks, the Bank of England and the financial industrial complex keynotes. they have major markets in terms of derivatives.<\/p>\n
FX markets there used to be more dominant in investment banking. , but now you know it\u2019s mainly FX and they\u2019ve also got Lloyds of London in the insurance markets. And so the remnants of the financial industrial complex is in Switzerland is in Amsterdam, but they didn\u2019t have their separate jurisdiction. So if you look at Switzerland, the Bank for International Settlements has its own police, its own law, its own, , jurisdiction, its own army. , the City of London has the same. And then you have the Vatican, which has the same and Vatican Bank. , and then you have the Federal Reserve System, which ties in to the Bank for International Settlement System. And so UK, , needed that independent city of London. So they asset stripped the country, the economy, and they concentrate all wealth into the stock market. , and they maintain their, , derivative and currency war manipulation. You know, they were involved with Scott Bessent in destroying the Iranian currency before the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. You know, they had Mossad in there doing the shootings, right. , which, , Lindsey Graham was very proud of. , we had, , Scott percent say that we launched Operation Economic Theory, which was effectively to destroy the currency for all the savers in Iran and.<\/p>\n
The.<\/p>\n
Very old. They would then be shot at by Mossad. Uprise, come against the IRGC and then create the agitation, , for for the war and everything that led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.<\/p>\n
So, Simon, what a lot of people focus on, , the British politics, the regime change, European Union, the United States, Donald Trp, very few actually talking about the role of the British monarchy, which has over long periods of time, has survived empires, world wars, decolonization, multiple constitutional crisis. So let\u2019s talk about that. As Britain enters what you believe is a period of profound restructuring. What role does the royal family actually play?<\/p>\n
It\u2019s an interesting question, and I could never prove it to you categorically. We don\u2019t need to.<\/p>\n
I mean, this is from a high vantage, theoretical point of view.<\/p>\n
Okay. Here\u2019s my view. And some people might disagree. Some people believe that there\u2019s like an old establishment British monarchy. , and someone like Trp is taking on the monarchy and coming against, like, protecting the American constitution against this financial industrial complex. And it\u2019s a bit like you have a useful narrative. You also have one of those for Israel, right? You make it look like Israel rules the world, but Israel is a node for the military. Yeah. And when America wants to stop Israel, they stop them. You know, but they want them to think that Israel rules the world because then you have plausible deniability so that when you want to commit crimes against hanity, genocide, ethnic cleansing.<\/p>\n
You blame it on the Jews.<\/p>\n
Technology. You say it was them. It wasn\u2019t us. And we were blackmailed by Epstein. You know, when Epstein works for military and financial powers, he was a he was a node in the fig. Now, the Epstein files don\u2019t point to, you know, Lex Wexner and and JP Morgan and Jamie Dimon, the people that control them, they\u2019re they\u2019ve settled, you know, they\u2019ve already settled. , but the people they want to take out like a node in the royal family, like Prince Andrew. , then you can just reveal that when they\u2019re no longer a useful asset. And so some people believe that the British monarchy is on the top of the chain. I do believe that they have the remnants of the British East India Company still structured into the asset structure of the British royal family, which, if you don\u2019t know, , we weren\u2019t making all of that money out of tea, , from India. We were making all that money out of creating drugs and opi, , and surrounding it by tea and then getting the Chinese addicted to opi and then raiding them and stealing all their silver and stealing all the India\u2019s gold. , you know, we, we, we definitely the British East India Company wasn\u2019t there\u2019s not that much money in tea. There\u2019s a lot of money in drugs. , and so those drug trafficking routes still exist via MI6CIA Mossad. , and they involve certain jurisdictions, key nodes like Hong Kong and UAE. , and those are connected to if you look at the deep, what we call the deep state, , they\u2019re funded by han trafficking, sex trafficking, weapons trafficking, drug trafficking, and all the crimes that partner with the cartels. And they give them the necessary protection because they fund the black op operations of MI6. Cia , and, , and Mossad, which are then used in order to manufacture the wars that the military industrial complex profits from and are financed by the financial industrial complex and leads to the technological innovation.<\/p>\n
Because if you look at all America\u2019s technology, America is famous for its technology. Every single piece of that technology was innovated originally by Pentagon budgets for killing people. And then they privatize it through a private public partnership, which is why you get all these companies that are CIA, DARPA funded In-Q-Tel, the CIA venture capital arm, and then they they create a lovely story about how this entrepreneur made it in a garage. , and then suddenly you manufacture an entrepreneur that is subordinate to fic like Elon Musk that\u2019s dependent upon continued military funding. , and, , and, and you privatize all those profits for the shareholders. It\u2019s just a money laundering mechanism for taking the national debt of the country and siphoning it through to the private corporate interests. So then they can control more and more capital. And then with that capital control, you can exert more influence over more and more governments globally and interfere in their politics. So taking that full circle, , Keir Starmer worked for Larry Fink, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics. . He doesn\u2019t work for the monarchy. , because the monarchy has kind of taken too many of those assets, put it in offshore trust structures and those offshore trusts structure trust structures are the key shareholders in BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, all of the all of the financial infrastructure, they\u2019re all public companies. And now they\u2019ve been concentrated up into the asset managers. And then the shareholders of the asset managers are obvious gated via a lot of these private family office trust structures hosted in Cayman Islands and BVI and Isle of Man and every other thing.<\/p>\n
Simon, there\u2019s another thing I want to talk to you about the trend of, , over the past two decades, more or less, we\u2019ve seen a nber of prominent members of the British aristocracy in general, not only the royal family, diplomatic circles, , establishment in general, embrace Islam. Now, some dismiss this, , as kind of an isolated personal decisions. But there are others who believe that it reflects a much deeper, , civilizational shift. Do you see a pattern emerging or are people reading too much into all of this stuff?<\/p>\n
Yeah. So, , these are psychological operations. They\u2019re psyops. So when you\u2019re an asset, when you\u2019re asset strip in a country, you create severe wealth inequality. , when you create severe wealth inequality, you end up with the situation that we\u2019re in in the UK, Europe, America, Canada, Australia, South Korea, Japan. We have record low birth rates and record record low birth rates means you\u2019re becoming extinct.<\/p>\n
, look at look at.<\/p>\n
Russia, for example.<\/p>\n
Exactly. Yes. , and so why does that happen? Well, when you have severe wealth inequality, people start to think they can\u2019t afford children. , you then use psychological operations that create record high suicide rates, people fighting in these wars that then Julian Assange reveals they had to kill a million civilians.<\/p>\n
Yeah.<\/p>\n
, that brings people back and then they end up homeless. , post traatic stress disorder, you know, traatic syndrome. Sorry, I\u2019m not saying the right word, but you know what I mean. , PTSD. That\u2019s what I was trying to say.<\/p>\n
Post-traatic stress.<\/p>\n
Disorder.<\/p>\n
Yeah.<\/p>\n
Addicted to drugs and on alcohol. And so all of those metrics are at the highest level across Europe, UK, America right now. We\u2019re looking more and more like the Republic. This is record degeneracy. This is what it looked like. , and so when you have those situations and you have a pension crisis, it means you\u2019ve got a demographic issue. That demographic issue is that you\u2019ve got these unproductive, debt laden people. You\u2019ve maxed them out on their credit cards, their mortgages, everything. , and, , they\u2019re not, they\u2019re not contributing the amount of tax that\u2019s needed in order to pay for those that are about to retire. So you either find a way of reducing the population of retirees, Covid. , or you find a way of changing the demographics. And so you meet that through, , immigration. And it\u2019s quite a simple thing. You\u2019re just trying to bring in taxpayers. Now when you\u2019re at the asset stripping phase, you can also use it as a psyop. So because you want them to blame the politicians and the immigrants, you manufacture a narrative by control of media to make people into the most extreme version of themselves. So imagine you\u2019re a, you\u2019re a, you\u2019re a, you\u2019re a, you\u2019re a white British person. Your life is getting worse and worse and worse. You\u2019re finding it harder and harder to get by. Your wife has to work, your children have to work. You\u2019re feeling demasked. , you don\u2019t feel like you\u2019re able to provide for your family.<\/p>\n
, and you look around and you feel like everything\u2019s getting worse and worse and worse. Well, you need an other to blame. The first thing you do is you say Keir Starmer, it\u2019s you. So they\u2019re the battering ram, right? To take you away from who\u2019s actually doing this. And then the immigrant is the other one. And what you can do is you can use algorithms in order to radicalize people further and further and further. So you can show them video clips of everyone started praying in a particular area of London, and you make it look like the entire country is being taken over by Muslims. And you obfuscate. You then do operations. Like if you look at Safari Club was the was the covert operation that was created by the the Bush administration? Yeah. They groomed Osama bin laden. , they regime changed Saudi Arabia and assassinated King Faisal. , and then they, they did, , again, you say on YouTube, I\u2019ve got significant evidence that nine over 11 was done by CIA, Mossad and Saudi intelligence. , and so they do this. That was to justify all the wars and to radicalize. So let me just bring this back down. There are psychological operations. And if you think this is extreme, here\u2019s an extreme thought. If you don\u2019t think they do this today, then this would be the first time in han history that power hasn\u2019t weaponized religion in order to recruit armies.<\/p>\n
Absolutely.<\/p>\n
To be able to create wars. And if you look at Israel\u2019s a classic example, Israel created by the Rothschilds, , and the British monarchy via the Balfour Declaration during World War One, not World War Two, there was no this wasn\u2019t a reaction to the Holocaust. This was created before the Holocaust.<\/p>\n
And it.<\/p>\n
Was because the British Empire needed oil in the Middle East, and so they needed to destabilize. So they worked with the Rothschild family that partnered with the Zionists, and they manufactured a fake narrative. And that fake narrative was to get population growth to move to Palestine in order to recruit an army, radicalize them and destabilize the region. So they. They weaponized Jewish. The Jewish faith in order to radicalize Jews, build up the IDF. And then they started creating training camps for groups like ISIS and al Qaeda, where you could create the war, kill people\u2019s families, torture them, put them in Guantanamo Bay, and then get them to recruit another militia army that you could use in order to divide and conquer the region. And then what did they do? They rewrote the Bible. , in 1917, , and said that the prophet Israel, which was a representation of Abraham, represented the country Israel. And now you\u2019ve got across America a massive amount of radicalized evangelical Christians.<\/p>\n
That.<\/p>\n
Believe they need to protect the country of Israel. Yeah. , in order to fulfill the return of Jesus and the Messiah. But if you look back, look back at all history. What did the people that created America now look at in. If you look at pre-Colbian times, it was believed that the highest consensus. There were 100 million natives on the land that we now call America. If you look at the first census they did, there was 250 000. How do you persuade a group of people to take 100 million population to 250, 000? You radicalize them into believing they\u2019re doing it for God. And so they were escaping British persecution, allegedly in a mission for God in order to deliver their land that they thought was, you know, for religious reason. Every single war and army have always weaponized faith in order to radicalize a group to justify how you recruit an army to commit crimes against hanity, and the latest ones are the IDF.<\/p>\n
Simon, there\u2019s the flip side to what we\u2019re talking about. In other words, throughout history, elites have often anticipated a geopolitical changes long before the general public. , for example, they\u2019ve invented a new trade routes. Before Empire shifted, they learned new languages before new markets emerged. Is it possible, again, we\u2019re theorizing that some segments of the British establishment view engagement with Islam not merely as a religious choice, but as a preparation for a changing geopolitical landscape.<\/p>\n
So I think there\u2019s two things. Two separate ops. One is you can use immigration in the West to divide and conquer, , to, to fuel racial tensions, religious tensions, deliberately by algorithm, through your, through your social credit score. And then you can use that to take the technology that was tested in Muslim countries like Palestine and bring it home and build a police and surveillance state. And so if you look at open border, closed border, that was clearly not Trp versus Biden. That was clearly a uni party, , policy of have open borders and then bring in ice, develop the privatized prison industry, develop the deportation industry, build the police and surveillance state, and then bring Palantir in. And then you lead, you have someone like Trp that delivers a narrative that they\u2019re, they\u2019re, they\u2019re doing stuff to your children and all that stuff. Now, you can make some of that true. They could deliberately bring in criminals from around the world to radicalize that theory. Like they\u2019re, they\u2019re not beyond this. These are the same people that have been killing hundreds of millions of people all around the world in order to acquire Resources and regime change governments. These are the same powers they don\u2019t have. You know that that that type of agenda. Now, the other thing is let\u2019s look at that. So that\u2019s the technical industrial complex. The military industrial complex needs that to justify war.<\/p>\n
So they nine over 11 then you had Libya war, Sudan war, Somalia, Iraq, , Lebanon, , you know, Sudan, Syria and now Iran. , and so that narrative was needed to radicalize the Americans into believing that, , you know, that this whole terrorism stuff that America and the Brits manufactured deliberately, they manufactured this, they want this. It\u2019s part of the plan. Okay. , now that\u2019s one thing. Then you have the other thing that is very interesting. If you look at the case of the UK, , so 6% of the population is Muslim, The largest demographic of immigrants is actually Nigerians, which are predominantly Christian, some Muslim Nigerians and Chinese, which are in general atheist, and Indian, which are in general Hindu with some Muslims, but they focus on the Muslims in order to have a tool and a weapon, because that weapon was built over decades from nine over 11 and prior to nine over 11. You know, that\u2019s when al Qaeda and ISIS were manufactured by the West, , via Saudi and Israel in order to have terrorism to justify this change. , now there\u2019s another change that\u2019s happening. So that\u2019s the military industrial complex gets their war. The, the technical industrial complex gets their police and surveillance state Pre-crime arrest Palantir AI, social credit scores, digital ID, central bank. Digital currencies, stablecoins, do you know all of that stuff? All of that good stuff that we got coming.<\/p>\n
But then the financial industrial complex has a really interesting situation. I believe right now that the fic is, , asset stripping America while they prepare for Multi-polarity and they\u2019re building global financial centers that had to partner with sovereign wealth funds. The largest source of sovereign wealth funds were those that control the strategic ports and strategic energy. So in the case of Europe, you had Norway, in the case of Asia, you had Singapore, China, , as the main as the main players, but a massive amount of it was concentrated in the Middle East, what used to be known as West Asia. So now let\u2019s look at this. You\u2019ve got let\u2019s look at all the different ports that are important in a multi-polar world and the largest sources of LNG, which is going to power all this AI and robotics. They\u2019re all a massive chunk of it is controlled by Muslim countries. So you\u2019ve got Yemen with the Houthis there. , you\u2019ve got North Africa, which has, you know, , , Muslim populations. You\u2019ve got the GCC, see Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, various other, , countries. , and then you\u2019ve got the most strategic port into Asia, which is Singapore, non-Muslim, but Indonesia and Malaysia. So in this world that\u2019s being built as a result of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, there\u2019s a massive Muslim, you know, Muslim countries that go from, , sectarian countries which are divide and conquer operations to secular ones like Indonesia and Malaysia to, you know, more like monarchies, , and, , and then revolutionary ones as well.<\/p>\n
So you have this complete spectr of governance structures within these different Muslim populations. What was really interesting about the UK is that when they regime changed and did some tax policies that led to the a massive chunk of millionaires and billionaires leaving the UK, just like they\u2019re doing in the Netherlands right now. They all went to UAE. So the the largest recipient of those Brits was a Muslim country. So the net beneficiary of this were these Muslim countries that are building the remnants of the wealth from the previous colonies and getting them to relocate to their country while they build out these new alternative financial systems, financial rails, and reset the world order. And so is it possible that a country could be anti-Muslim but also pro-muslim at the same time? Well, UAE is exactly that country, and there is significant evidence that there was a network of NGOs and private companies that were funding, you know, many of these different fake mosque structures, which were just political entities in order to manufacture this narrative. And so, remember, separate the religion from the OP. These are psychological operations.<\/p>\n
So let\u2019s look at this.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s look at this. We got about five minutes left. There\u2019s so much stuff I want to talk to you about still. So, Simon, for 30 years. Okay. We\u2019re going to the post Soviet period. The the West believed ideology had replaced civilization. We had liberal democracy, a globalization. Markets are supposed to dissolve these ancient identities. But if you look at the world today, religion, civilization, historical memory. All of this stuff is returning to the to the center of world politics. For example, China speaks in civilizational terms. Russia does. To India. The Islamic world increasingly does. So has the West completely misunderstood or misinterpreted the century we have entered? Are we moving from the age of ideologies back to the age of civilizations?<\/p>\n
The ideology is for the people below the financial industrial complex. The financial industrial complex has one religion capital, money, profits, revenue. They will do anything in order to maximize those matrices, including making you believe that your government\u2019s in charge, your media is independent, your vote matters, and the ideology is what\u2019s actually happening here. They will weaponize all of those tools in order to have give you a full sense of the world when really every type of governance structure, from democracy to absolute monarchy to communism to capitalism, ended up with those that control the capital, controlling the people. And the rest is just, , the, the fake narrative of communism versus capitalism. When China is so far from communism and America is so far from capitalism is just a divide and conquer operation in order to justify the Cold War. And remember who funded the Cold War? Well, 1917 remember that year where the Balfour Declaration and the British Empire and the Rothschilds started partnering with the Zionists in order to create Israel to destabilize the Middle East? They also funded the Bolsheviks that overthrew the Russian saw and replaced it with the Communist Manifesto, a Western ideology of Karl Marx, and installed it into the Soviet Union and Russia. The same Wall Street that was funding fascism that manufactured the Weimar Republic and funded Hitler in order to create the fascist uprising that led to World War Two. The same brothers, the Warburgs that were on the governor of the Federal Reserve as well as the Reichsbank that manufactured the disaster that created the Bank for International Settlements. And so capital has no ideology, but they have useful idiots everywhere. This isn\u2019t to diminish ideology. This is to say they will weaponize ideology. And if you follow the money, which is what I spent the last 25 years of my life doing, you\u2019ll find out that is actually the biggest indicator. And what capital flows tell you is opposite to what politicians are telling you and what the media needs you to believe.<\/p>\n
So, Simon, let\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Do a final round, rapid, a rapid fire, one word or short answers. Most dangerous country.<\/p>\n
. Ukraine.<\/p>\n
Israel.<\/p>\n
Oh, most.<\/p>\n
Definitely. In terms of.<\/p>\n
Yeah. Most. But I do.<\/p>\n
Believe I\u2019ll give a quick answer. I do believe Israel is being privatized and acquired by transnational capital. And you are meant to believe they\u2019re more powerful than they are. They\u2019re not as powerful as they make you believe.<\/p>\n
Most undervalued asset.<\/p>\n
, I would say Bitcoin and self-custody where you\u2019re running a node. , and you own the keys.<\/p>\n
Gold or Bitcoin.<\/p>\n
, I like both, but I\u2019ve got significantly higher percentage allocated towards Bitcoin.<\/p>\n
Dollar in ten years. What does it look like.<\/p>\n
In ten years? I think it may be it\u2019s weaker than gold and weaker than Bitcoin. It may be on par with DXY. But foreign countries in a multi-polar world will outperform the dollar.<\/p>\n
China or America.<\/p>\n
in terms of the next empire I think China would I want to live there. Well, I lived in Hong Kong for several years. , I think they are two of the same, at least in China. You know, who\u2019s in charge in America, you don\u2019t know who\u2019s in charge. And they\u2019re partnered right now, , to create this technical police and surveillance state.<\/p>\n
Will Europe recover?<\/p>\n
, , no. Europe\u2019s going to get worse and worse and worse. It doesn\u2019t get better. Same with the UK AI bubble. , we are in an AI bubble, but AI will still change the world, but I think it will be the second wave of investors that control the most important grids of the AI data centers. This round will probably get rekt, and after the lock in periods, I\u2019m sure the VCs are out.<\/p>\n
Quant computing.<\/p>\n
, yeah. I mean, quant is the the one world government that\u2019s going to be controlling all this AI and robotics.<\/p>\n
And finally, one prediction. Nobody believes today.<\/p>\n
That Israel doesn\u2019t rule the world and that it will be acquired by the Gulf countries, and Palestine will have a state, and eventually there\u2019ll be an Arab majority, and all the radical Zionists will just go somewhere else. , and it turns out that, , yeah, Israel doesn\u2019t rule the world.<\/p>\n
And, , we\u2019re out of time. But before we go, , how can we follow you? Your stuff is amazing. And I want people to listen to you, read your stuff, read your books, and follow your advice. The floor is yours.<\/p>\n
Yeah. So I give real time updates on Twitter. Sorry. X at Simon Dixon Twitter when it was called Twitter. Yeah. , I also, , go live once a week on my YouTube channel at Simon Dixon 21. , I talk between everything that happened that week for like 2 to 4 hours. , and I follow the money and then I analyze what I got wrong and then project what I think is going to happen. , and then if you don\u2019t have time for that, I created a structure on Simon dixon.com where it pulls all those long, it creates five minute videos, 30 minute videos, blog smaries, , and a community of people. , but I don\u2019t sell anything. No upsell, no sponsorship, no monetization. , I live what I teach and I try to help people get more sovereign.<\/p>\n
Simon, thanks.<\/p>\n
So much for your time again, I love your work. And for everyone who\u2019s watching us, it\u2019s a lot of people going to watch the show. Absolutely. You must follow Simon Dixon. Simon, thanks again. We\u2019d love to have you back sometime in the future.<\/p>\n
Thanks for having me. We could have gone on forever.<\/p>\n
We could have. And we\u2019ll do that next time. Take care. Bye bye. Bye.<\/p>\n
Bye.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thanks so much for joining us. I\u2019m Daniel Estulin and welcome to Estulim.Media. So for decades, we\u2019ve been taught to understand the world through a familiar lens. We follow elections, wars, economic crisis, diplomatic smits, the rise and fall of political leaders. And so every day, we\u2019re told who won, who lost to gain political influence, who is in decline. But what if those are not the real or it\u2019s not the real story? What if these events are merely the visible surface of a much larger, much deeper transformation, one that is reshaping the very foundation of the international system. Because today\u2019s world is undergoing one of the most profound transitions since the end of World War Two, the institutions that defined post 1945 order are under unprecedented pressure. The balance between military power, financial power, Technological power is shifting before our eyes. Artificial intelligence is becoming a strategic asset for financial markets increasingly influence government. Silicon Valley is moving even closer to Washington. The Middle East is being reorganized. Europe is searching for a new identity. And so beneath it all lies a fundamental question who will shape the architecture of the next world order? And so to explore these questions, I\u2019m joined by someone who spent years analyzing the intersection of finance, geopolitics, technology from a perspective that often challenges conventional thinking.<\/p>\n
Simon Dixon is one of the world\u2019s best known macro investors and financial analysts. And over the years I\u2019ve been following for many, many years, he has developed a framework that connects monetary policy, sovereign debt, capital markets, and official intelligence Bitcoin geopolitical strategy into this kind of a single analytical model. Whether you agree with all of his and our conclusions or not, his work forces us to ask deeper questions about how power actually works in the 21st century. So today we\u2019re going to move beyond the headlines. We\u2019re not here to debate personalities or daily political events. I couldn\u2019t care less about that. Instead, we will examine the structures that shape those events because in the post world, international order, , it\u2019s, it\u2019s obviously coming to an end. That\u2019s one of the questions we\u2019re going to discuss. Is military power giving way to technological power? Has Europe entered a period of managed decline? What role will Donald Trp play in America\u2019s transformation? Is the Middle East becoming the center of a new geopolitical architecture? And perhaps the most important question of all, what does all of this mean for the future of our civilization? Simon, thanks so much for your time. Welcome back to our show. It\u2019s a pleasure to have you with us again.<\/p>\n
All right. Thank you so much for having me. Yeah, I think it\u2019s worth, kind of shaping a bit of the world as we were used to. So, you know, we were we were really understand the world in terms of a nation state, being a power with a competing power or a rising power and those nation states tend to find, you know, they tend to fight military battles, financial warfare or technical supremacy, , depending on what the technology is now it\u2019s AI and robotics. , previously it was, you know, farming or some kind of technology around something that would fundamentally change and give a competitive edge. In the case of the British and the Dutch empires, which were the previous two empires, it was naval fleets and it was financial engineering. And so the Dutch Empire, they created a structure one was the Amsterdam Central Bank, whose job was to socialize losses and privatize gains. A government whose job was to take on the debt through the bond market. And a private limited company called the Dutch East India Company, whose job was to privatize all the profits. And so you had the government take on the debt and the company take on the profits and the central bank was the vehicle for obfuscating that reality through fiat currencies. Now, in the Dutch Empire, the Dutch guilder was backed by gold.<\/p>\n
And so there was an inbuilt mechanism for holding back, you know, money printing to make sure it doesn\u2019t destroy your value that was the Dutch Empire. And they built the largest naval fleet in the world. And then they outsourced the labor to the Brits and then the Brits built the, the replicated the whole structure but this time they created the Bank of England, the British East India Company and the UK government, built the largest naval fleet so that the British East India Company could steal the world\u2019s resources use it for the profits of the British Empire and build a global colony, when they bankrupted the UK government and they were unable to exert force because the colonies got too complicated, there was a managed transition over to the American Empire, this time the American Empire had significant resources itself. And so the Europeans, colonized and took over the land genocided the ethnics and locals and then you ended up with a new class of people that resisted against the Brits, but really, was it sovereign autonomous control Or was it actually the financial layers that controlled the Dutch Empire? The British Empire also ended up controlling the American Empire after their independence, and we\u2019re about to celebrate, you know, the 250 years.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s talk about Europe and the control dismantling of the continent. I don\u2019t want to ask you about whether Europe is in decline. I think that\u2019s that\u2019s obvious to everyone. But I want to understand is something much deeper. Is Europe simply failing or is it being systematically restructured? In other words, are we witnessing collapse, or are we witnessing a controlled dismantling or demolition of the post-war European model?<\/p>\n
Yeah. So if you look at those Dutch, British, American, you hit a phase where the currency can no longer sustain what I call the heightened asset stripping phase, and so once you\u2019ve loaded up the government with so much debt and your bank effectively not quite bankrupted it, but you get it ready for a debt restructuring, you then need to, you know, move on and you continue to strip assets. So financial power continues to strip assets. So if you look at the Dutch Empire, even today, they\u2019re at the final stage of asset stripping after all these centuries, because now they\u2019re even implementing unrealized taxes, as I speak. Yeah. And so unrealized taxes is where all of the wealthy people leave that have the assets that decreases the tax revenue, those that are suffering from inflation end up having to sell their assets. Plus, if you can\u2019t get them to sell their assets, you charge tax on it where they have to either do two things. They either have to borrow against their asset, in which case they take on more debt, asse more debt. With this financial industrial complex or, or they end up selling the assets that crashes the assets so that transnational capital can sweep up the assets with private equity, or they can refinance your debt and, and send you deeper into debt. And that\u2019s kind of like the final stage of asset stripping, as it were. If you look at the Brits, you put them through decades and decades of the average interest on their debt is higher than the growth rate of the country.<\/p>\n
That means you\u2019re becoming more and more subordinate to financial, you\u2019re borrowing more and more from bond holders. And when you borrow more and more from bond holders, bond holders have more political control over the government through lobby And then they can redirect the capital into the stock market. And so you end up with the stock market running away from the economy. That\u2019s the situation with Britain right now. So the Dutch empire is being asset stripped in the final stage. The British Empire is just about to go through its IMF bailout, austerity, reduction of benefits, civil unrest campaign and the American empire is kind of further along that cycle. They\u2019re at the stage where they\u2019re taking all of the debt, which is the bond market, pushing all of it into the stock markets. You\u2019re getting massive stock market valuations, massive wealth concentration and then, you then eventually go to later the asset stripping, but what you do is you set up a new empire in the meantime. So what does that empire look like? You know, three things very briefly. And we can dive wherever you want. One of them is you concentrate power in your sphere of influence, which is Europe. And so you slowly asset strip Europe into the US stock market and various other stock markets, the other thing you do is you use what assets you have left in order to negotiate leverage into the new world order.<\/p>\n
And you take your capital markets and you slowly exert capital out in line with the new empire. And so what we\u2019re looking at right now is the complete hollowing out of Europe and asset stripping it into the, the stock market, then you\u2019ve got a transition to set up multi-polar spheres of influence. And at the same time, knowing that this can create a lot of civil unrest because there\u2019s not a natural progression. The Europeans and the Americans always had this natural progression where they were able to coordinate. In a multi-polar world, you have competing factions of power, you know, whether it be China, which is a nationalist government, or whether it be, you know, energy companies that have managed to preserve their sovereign wealth into a sovereign wealth fund. Energy countries rather, these are competing factions of power. So you try to use the assets that you have, aI, robotics, military power, financial capital and build influence globally in, into a multi-polar world. So, and then you negotiate this one what, what I think the technology is trying to do is recognizing, okay, China, you are the rising power, America, we\u2019re private asset stripped we got the whole west into the stock market and let\u2019s build one global AI technocratic control grid and digital control grid and divvy up the world into multipolarity controlled by one control, technocratic, kind of privatized partnership with the Chinese Communist Party.<\/p>\n
So let me ask you this. The speaking of the financial dimension, you are one of the few people actually who argues that financial markets ultimately discipline governments. So is Europe increasingly governed through debt markets rather than democratic politics? Has sovereign debt, in other words, become the mechanism through which national sovereignty is quietly transferred elsewhere?<\/p>\n
Yeah. So when I think of power and when I look through these empires, you know, from Dutch, British to American, you\u2019ll notice that the dominant force, the dominant power in a capitalist economy and this is not the traditional definition of capitalism because capitalism would require a free market where capital competes. When you have a central bank that determines the price of capital, then you don\u2019t have capitalism, and when you have a government that can asse the debt, what you end up with is socialism for the wealthy because they get bailed out, socialize the losses, and privatize the gains and capitalism for the poor. They have to compete, but they can\u2019t compete because They get the highest interest rate. If you think of you\u2019re at the bottom of the chain, and you\u2019re on payday loans and credit cards to survive, you\u2019re paying the highest interest rate. Whereas if you\u2019re a bank, you\u2019re actually creating money every time you issue a loan, so you actually get free money. And so if you go along that spectrum, you\u2019ve got companies, the larger the company, like say Apple, they can borrow on the debt capital markets at a cheaper rate, a country, and then a country like America, if you want to borrow for a month, then you pay a lower interest rate.<\/p>\n
If you want to borrow for 30 years, then you\u2019re paying a higher interest rate. So, you know, but when that is determined via a central bank, then you no longer have capitalism. And so we have this distorted reality. But in effect, individuals are controlled by their access to capital and the interest on their debt. , which is what determines whether they can use that debt in order to invest in assets. And then those assets outperform the money printing and the inflation. And if you get that wrong, if you use your debt in order to conse and purchase goods, then you just end up getting poorer and poorer and poorer as the rich get richer and richer and richer. And then all the assets at the end of the cycle where we are in America right now, you have like 92% of stock market value, which are held by 10% of institutions and wealthy individuals. , and so capital is what determines. And you can look at that. That\u2019s at the individual level, you know, it\u2019s mortgages, credit cards, everything. Then you look at the corporate level, you know, your ability to go public, sell your shares gives you access to debt capital markets. , and so debt is a subordination vehicle and then that the sovereign country level, the bond holders dictate, you know, the bond vigilantes, , they have the ability to destroy your currency to force you to print currency in order to pay your debt price in another currency.<\/p>\n
, or, , they, you know, , they can basically lobby in order to buy the politicians. And so when, when financial power and one things that happens in investment banking, and I used to work in investment banking is you turn all the businesses into products, you load them up with debt, you get voting rights, and then you install your own board. And then the executives now work for you. And so they work for your bonds, your equity, voting rights, , and your board that you install. And so then as this happens, as you take more and more companies public and you subordinate more and more, , companies where their net, their net worth is dependent upon you giving access to capital and defending their share price. , so this, this complex as it were, this financial industrial complex, I call it, , which consists of asset managers, investment banks, private equity, Silicon Valley, you know, , , banks that create fiat currency. , they, they act as a complex. And in my estimation, most governments in the extreme case, you take all Europe, Canada, Australia, US, UK, , they\u2019re the Canada, they\u2019re all subordinate to transnational capital and the, the financial industrial complex.<\/p>\n
Then you\u2019ve got the other extreme, the Chinese Communist Party in China, where capital is now allowed to control the government. And so the. All companies are subordinate to the government and you get more authoritarian type of structure. And then you have a hybrid where a country like Saudi, let\u2019s say, you know, , and even Iran in this case, , they keep their resources, they take those resources and they put it in a sovereign wealth fund. And then they can partner with this financial industrial complex to co-invest. And that buys them influence to try and keep out the fic. And the jackals, I\u2019ll call it fic financial industrial complex from their country. And those are the battles one sovereign country, which is China, a bunch of countries which have sovereign wealth funds which had to co-invest and co op fic in order to keep the jackals out from regime, changing them and taking them over. And then countries which have neoliberal, , globalized financial capital markets, which are fully subordinate to the financial industrial complex and the government\u2019s work for them. Every. Every politician has to go up a ladder of securing capital from the lobby, providing value to the lobby, and then eventually being in a compromised network like Jeffrey Epstein. If you want to go all the way to the top, like Trp.<\/p>\n
Simon, I wanted to ask you a question from a vantage point of where are we? So history offers us many examples of great civilizations that slowly lost economic vitality before losing political influence. Which historical period best resembles Europe today? Are we talking about the late Roman Empire, the decline of Venice, the British Empire after World War Two? Or is today\u2019s transformation historically unprecedented?<\/p>\n
Interesting. , I would just call Europe at this stage a fully subordinate vehicle like that. All of the politicians work for a faction of power. Let\u2019s take UK right now, for example. Sorry. And then I\u2019ll I\u2019ll bring it back.<\/p>\n
Actually, I do want to talk to you about UK. Yeah, we\u2019ll definitely I want to, I want to do a segment on UK and the. Okay and the British royal family.<\/p>\n
Yeah. , but right now, if you look at we\u2019ve had seven regime changes in ten years. We just had another regime change. Let\u2019s just look at the, the not, you know, the so so people.<\/p>\n
Understand sorry to interrupt you so that people who are watching us understand we\u2019re not talking about regime change, , something like gadhafi. We\u2019re talking about one prime minister leaving and someone else comes in in his place. Go ahead.<\/p>\n
Well, I call it regime changes because I think democracies are fake. , I think politicians are selected, not elected, obviously. , and, , so I like to put everything on a fair, , language ground. Even the Federal Reserve was recently regime change with Kevin Warsh by the banks that wanted him in. They pretend it\u2019s Trp, they pretend it\u2019s the politician. The politician is just a battering ram for the public. Their job is to do what their lobby wants them to do. It\u2019s a regime. They\u2019re paid like they\u2019re paid for rent, prostitutes, , for financial power, technical power, big pharma, , you know, military power, whatever, whoever\u2019s willing to pay the most. And their job is to do what they are meant to do for what they were paid to do, but create a narrative that makes them think they work for the people. And slowly, when the people realize that they\u2019re not doing what they elected them for, they get regime changed and someone else is selected and they\u2019re selected based upon how much they\u2019re paid by that lobby. So if you look back at the UK, , you had , let\u2019s start with Boris Johnson. Boris Johnson was there to implement lockdowns and create a narrative that would justify the lockdowns. That was his main purpose for a World Economic For agenda.<\/p>\n
His job was also to Later. , make sure that Russia and Ukraine never sign a peace deal for the military industrial complex. , and get in the way of any thought of peace. . Now, then he was regime changed, so maybe he didn\u2019t serve power or you just keep rolling him over once they serve their agenda and suddenly we get Ex-goldman Sachs guy, , Rishi Sunak. , and, , suddenly you get a shameful exit. So that\u2019s the leverage that they have over the politician, but then they leave and they carry on working for the same power as a private contractor. You know, Tony Blair all this time again, what did Rishi Sunak do where he was through his family office, the larger investor in the company that was producing all the vaccines. And so he was a massive investor in vaccines. So his job was to make sure that everyone, , gets vaccinated. , they make a load of profit. Then later the share price collapses. He leaves in shame. They do a regime change. Suddenly we get Liz Truss. , Liz Truss does a policy that doesn\u2019t make financial sense to the Bank of England. She gets regime changed in a couple of weeks. , and the Bank of England and the bond vigilantes say, no, we\u2019re not going down that path.<\/p>\n
And then suddenly we get Keir Starmer. Who\u2019s Keir Starmer? Well, he was a military contractor. What did what was he involved when he was, he was part of the case of taking down Julian Assange. , that was exposing the Iraq, you know, the Iraq war and all the crimes against hanity, exposing the military industrial complex and all the crimes they commit and the money laundering operations. And so Keir Starmer made him out like he was a sex offender, , and tried to take him down because he was posting all this stuff on Wikileaks, Wikileaks funded by Bitcoin. , and then there was a structure that where were internal whistleblowers in the military that were exposing all these things. , and so now Keir Starmer, what\u2019s his biggest contribution? He just got regime changed. But what was his biggest contribution? It was to pretend that the British people are defending democracy, while the Bank of England prints money, they launder it through to Ukraine. , Ukraine, corrupt politicians that were installed and like Zelensky and installed and manufactured by the CIA. , create a narrative to get Europe to print money, to get America to print money. , and then they siphon it back into Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon, BAE systems, Palantir.<\/p>\n
And they provided a technical integration test bed for integrating drones with artificial intelligence. , and they\u2019ll keep that on until the last Ukrainian. , and they can try and, you know, agitate. There was a CIA op in order to agitate Russia in 2014 when they did the regime change that led to the installation of Zelensky. So all this to say, I think regime is the appropriate word because we don\u2019t have democracies. , if you want to engage in politics, then you need to buy politicians point blank. That\u2019s what Peter Thiel does. He manufactured JD Vance. Look at Trp. He was paid for by Elon Musk. Then the Bank of New York Mellon family, Peter Thiel. And he was also paid for by Mariam Edelsten, which is the Israel stuff. But what about on top of that, there was $5 billion. Affinity partners, venture capital fund to invest in the reconstruction of the Middle East. , and that was managed by Jared Kushner with $2 billion investment from Saudi, , that required going to war with Iran in order to create the destruction that the fund would profit from. , and, , and so then if you want, we can look through his policies. I can tell you who paid for each policy.<\/p>\n
I was actually going to ask you something else because again, you talked about the regime change. You have 6 or 7 regime changes. And I totally agree with you with the terminology in Britain. But my question is, why Britain? Why has it become such an important testing ground? I mean, it could have been another country. It could have been France, it could have been Germany, it could have been Spain or Italy. We see an attempt on regime change in Spain right now. But why did it all start with Britain?<\/p>\n
All of the above. , this same operation. What do you think the European Union was? The European Union was a regime change. It was to centralize with the exception of the Bank of England, all of the currencies into the European Central Bank. So once you\u2019ve got one unified monetary policy, you can slowly remove move to a fiscal policy union through financial crisis, and then you can fix it with a capital market union. And then you have one European stock market. So all of these are concentration of power. Where did the European Union project come from? It came from the Bank for International Settlements.<\/p>\n
Write.<\/p>\n
The Bank for International Settlements that were set up in order to destroy the German economy, manage reparations after World War One so that you could give Germany massive gold debt. And the only way they could pay it is by printing their own currency. So they printed their own currency, , post World War One, in order to pay the gold through these reparations, which led to the Vollmer Republic, which led to such a distressed economy hyperinflationary cycle that it had a nationalist uprising called National Socialism, aka Hitler and Nazism, , which arrested the Rothschilds and created their own monetary policy. , but then was eventually regime changed by the Bank for International Settlements, again leading to the post-World war Two Empire, which was the creation of the IMF and the world Bank. And so the European Union was a construct of this for centralizing. So why England? Well, England, , you know, you had the Dutch Empire that was rolled up into Europe. but the Bank of England maintained its own currency. The reason for that is because City of London is a separate jurisdiction to the UK, and that separate jurisdiction has the one square mile with all these banks, the Bank of England and the financial industrial complex keynotes. they have major markets in terms of derivatives.<\/p>\n
FX markets there used to be more dominant in investment banking. , but now you know it\u2019s mainly FX and they\u2019ve also got Lloyds of London in the insurance markets. And so the remnants of the financial industrial complex is in Switzerland is in Amsterdam, but they didn\u2019t have their separate jurisdiction. So if you look at Switzerland, the Bank for International Settlements has its own police, its own law, its own, , jurisdiction, its own army. , the City of London has the same. And then you have the Vatican, which has the same and Vatican Bank. , and then you have the Federal Reserve System, which ties in to the Bank for International Settlement System. And so UK, , needed that independent city of London. So they asset stripped the country, the economy, and they concentrate all wealth into the stock market. , and they maintain their, , derivative and currency war manipulation. You know, they were involved with Scott Bessent in destroying the Iranian currency before the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. You know, they had Mossad in there doing the shootings, right. , which, , Lindsey Graham was very proud of. , we had, , Scott percent say that we launched Operation Economic Theory, which was effectively to destroy the currency for all the savers in Iran and.<\/p>\n
The.<\/p>\n
Very old. They would then be shot at by Mossad. Uprise, come against the IRGC and then create the agitation, , for for the war and everything that led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.<\/p>\n
So, Simon, what a lot of people focus on, , the British politics, the regime change, European Union, the United States, Donald Trp, very few actually talking about the role of the British monarchy, which has over long periods of time, has survived empires, world wars, decolonization, multiple constitutional crisis. So let\u2019s talk about that. As Britain enters what you believe is a period of profound restructuring. What role does the royal family actually play?<\/p>\n
It\u2019s an interesting question, and I could never prove it to you categorically. We don\u2019t need to.<\/p>\n
I mean, this is from a high vantage, theoretical point of view.<\/p>\n
Okay. Here\u2019s my view. And some people might disagree. Some people believe that there\u2019s like an old establishment British monarchy. , and someone like Trp is taking on the monarchy and coming against, like, protecting the American constitution against this financial industrial complex. And it\u2019s a bit like you have a useful narrative. You also have one of those for Israel, right? You make it look like Israel rules the world, but Israel is a node for the military. Yeah. And when America wants to stop Israel, they stop them. You know, but they want them to think that Israel rules the world because then you have plausible deniability so that when you want to commit crimes against hanity, genocide, ethnic cleansing.<\/p>\n
You blame it on the Jews.<\/p>\n
Technology. You say it was them. It wasn\u2019t us. And we were blackmailed by Epstein. You know, when Epstein works for military and financial powers, he was a he was a node in the fig. Now, the Epstein files don\u2019t point to, you know, Lex Wexner and and JP Morgan and Jamie Dimon, the people that control them, they\u2019re they\u2019ve settled, you know, they\u2019ve already settled. , but the people they want to take out like a node in the royal family, like Prince Andrew. , then you can just reveal that when they\u2019re no longer a useful asset. And so some people believe that the British monarchy is on the top of the chain. I do believe that they have the remnants of the British East India Company still structured into the asset structure of the British royal family, which, if you don\u2019t know, , we weren\u2019t making all of that money out of tea, , from India. We were making all that money out of creating drugs and opi, , and surrounding it by tea and then getting the Chinese addicted to opi and then raiding them and stealing all their silver and stealing all the India\u2019s gold. , you know, we, we, we definitely the British East India Company wasn\u2019t there\u2019s not that much money in tea. There\u2019s a lot of money in drugs. , and so those drug trafficking routes still exist via MI6CIA Mossad. , and they involve certain jurisdictions, key nodes like Hong Kong and UAE. , and those are connected to if you look at the deep, what we call the deep state, , they\u2019re funded by han trafficking, sex trafficking, weapons trafficking, drug trafficking, and all the crimes that partner with the cartels. And they give them the necessary protection because they fund the black op operations of MI6. Cia , and, , and Mossad, which are then used in order to manufacture the wars that the military industrial complex profits from and are financed by the financial industrial complex and leads to the technological innovation.<\/p>\n
Because if you look at all America\u2019s technology, America is famous for its technology. Every single piece of that technology was innovated originally by Pentagon budgets for killing people. And then they privatize it through a private public partnership, which is why you get all these companies that are CIA, DARPA funded In-Q-Tel, the CIA venture capital arm, and then they they create a lovely story about how this entrepreneur made it in a garage. , and then suddenly you manufacture an entrepreneur that is subordinate to fic like Elon Musk that\u2019s dependent upon continued military funding. , and, , and, and you privatize all those profits for the shareholders. It\u2019s just a money laundering mechanism for taking the national debt of the country and siphoning it through to the private corporate interests. So then they can control more and more capital. And then with that capital control, you can exert more influence over more and more governments globally and interfere in their politics. So taking that full circle, , Keir Starmer worked for Larry Fink, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics. . He doesn\u2019t work for the monarchy. , because the monarchy has kind of taken too many of those assets, put it in offshore trust structures and those offshore trusts structure trust structures are the key shareholders in BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, all of the all of the financial infrastructure, they\u2019re all public companies. And now they\u2019ve been concentrated up into the asset managers. And then the shareholders of the asset managers are obvious gated via a lot of these private family office trust structures hosted in Cayman Islands and BVI and Isle of Man and every other thing.<\/p>\n
Simon, there\u2019s another thing I want to talk to you about the trend of, , over the past two decades, more or less, we\u2019ve seen a nber of prominent members of the British aristocracy in general, not only the royal family, diplomatic circles, , establishment in general, embrace Islam. Now, some dismiss this, , as kind of an isolated personal decisions. But there are others who believe that it reflects a much deeper, , civilizational shift. Do you see a pattern emerging or are people reading too much into all of this stuff?<\/p>\n
Yeah. So, , these are psychological operations. They\u2019re psyops. So when you\u2019re an asset, when you\u2019re asset strip in a country, you create severe wealth inequality. , when you create severe wealth inequality, you end up with the situation that we\u2019re in in the UK, Europe, America, Canada, Australia, South Korea, Japan. We have record low birth rates and record record low birth rates means you\u2019re becoming extinct.<\/p>\n
, look at look at.<\/p>\n
Russia, for example.<\/p>\n
Exactly. Yes. , and so why does that happen? Well, when you have severe wealth inequality, people start to think they can\u2019t afford children. , you then use psychological operations that create record high suicide rates, people fighting in these wars that then Julian Assange reveals they had to kill a million civilians.<\/p>\n
Yeah.<\/p>\n
, that brings people back and then they end up homeless. , post traatic stress disorder, you know, traatic syndrome. Sorry, I\u2019m not saying the right word, but you know what I mean. , PTSD. That\u2019s what I was trying to say.<\/p>\n
Post-traatic stress.<\/p>\n
Disorder.<\/p>\n
Yeah.<\/p>\n
Addicted to drugs and on alcohol. And so all of those metrics are at the highest level across Europe, UK, America right now. We\u2019re looking more and more like the Republic. This is record degeneracy. This is what it looked like. , and so when you have those situations and you have a pension crisis, it means you\u2019ve got a demographic issue. That demographic issue is that you\u2019ve got these unproductive, debt laden people. You\u2019ve maxed them out on their credit cards, their mortgages, everything. , and, , they\u2019re not, they\u2019re not contributing the amount of tax that\u2019s needed in order to pay for those that are about to retire. So you either find a way of reducing the population of retirees, Covid. , or you find a way of changing the demographics. And so you meet that through, , immigration. And it\u2019s quite a simple thing. You\u2019re just trying to bring in taxpayers. Now when you\u2019re at the asset stripping phase, you can also use it as a psyop. So because you want them to blame the politicians and the immigrants, you manufacture a narrative by control of media to make people into the most extreme version of themselves. So imagine you\u2019re a, you\u2019re a, you\u2019re a, you\u2019re a, you\u2019re a white British person. Your life is getting worse and worse and worse. You\u2019re finding it harder and harder to get by. Your wife has to work, your children have to work. You\u2019re feeling demasked. , you don\u2019t feel like you\u2019re able to provide for your family.<\/p>\n
, and you look around and you feel like everything\u2019s getting worse and worse and worse. Well, you need an other to blame. The first thing you do is you say Keir Starmer, it\u2019s you. So they\u2019re the battering ram, right? To take you away from who\u2019s actually doing this. And then the immigrant is the other one. And what you can do is you can use algorithms in order to radicalize people further and further and further. So you can show them video clips of everyone started praying in a particular area of London, and you make it look like the entire country is being taken over by Muslims. And you obfuscate. You then do operations. Like if you look at Safari Club was the was the covert operation that was created by the the Bush administration? Yeah. They groomed Osama bin laden. , they regime changed Saudi Arabia and assassinated King Faisal. , and then they, they did, , again, you say on YouTube, I\u2019ve got significant evidence that nine over 11 was done by CIA, Mossad and Saudi intelligence. , and so they do this. That was to justify all the wars and to radicalize. So let me just bring this back down. There are psychological operations. And if you think this is extreme, here\u2019s an extreme thought. If you don\u2019t think they do this today, then this would be the first time in han history that power hasn\u2019t weaponized religion in order to recruit armies.<\/p>\n
Absolutely.<\/p>\n
To be able to create wars. And if you look at Israel\u2019s a classic example, Israel created by the Rothschilds, , and the British monarchy via the Balfour Declaration during World War One, not World War Two, there was no this wasn\u2019t a reaction to the Holocaust. This was created before the Holocaust.<\/p>\n
And it.<\/p>\n
Was because the British Empire needed oil in the Middle East, and so they needed to destabilize. So they worked with the Rothschild family that partnered with the Zionists, and they manufactured a fake narrative. And that fake narrative was to get population growth to move to Palestine in order to recruit an army, radicalize them and destabilize the region. So they. They weaponized Jewish. The Jewish faith in order to radicalize Jews, build up the IDF. And then they started creating training camps for groups like ISIS and al Qaeda, where you could create the war, kill people\u2019s families, torture them, put them in Guantanamo Bay, and then get them to recruit another militia army that you could use in order to divide and conquer the region. And then what did they do? They rewrote the Bible. , in 1917, , and said that the prophet Israel, which was a representation of Abraham, represented the country Israel. And now you\u2019ve got across America a massive amount of radicalized evangelical Christians.<\/p>\n
That.<\/p>\n
Believe they need to protect the country of Israel. Yeah. , in order to fulfill the return of Jesus and the Messiah. But if you look back, look back at all history. What did the people that created America now look at in. If you look at pre-Colbian times, it was believed that the highest consensus. There were 100 million natives on the land that we now call America. If you look at the first census they did, there was 250 000. How do you persuade a group of people to take 100 million population to 250, 000? You radicalize them into believing they\u2019re doing it for God. And so they were escaping British persecution, allegedly in a mission for God in order to deliver their land that they thought was, you know, for religious reason. Every single war and army have always weaponized faith in order to radicalize a group to justify how you recruit an army to commit crimes against hanity, and the latest ones are the IDF.<\/p>\n
Simon, there\u2019s the flip side to what we\u2019re talking about. In other words, throughout history, elites have often anticipated a geopolitical changes long before the general public. , for example, they\u2019ve invented a new trade routes. Before Empire shifted, they learned new languages before new markets emerged. Is it possible, again, we\u2019re theorizing that some segments of the British establishment view engagement with Islam not merely as a religious choice, but as a preparation for a changing geopolitical landscape.<\/p>\n
So I think there\u2019s two things. Two separate ops. One is you can use immigration in the West to divide and conquer, , to, to fuel racial tensions, religious tensions, deliberately by algorithm, through your, through your social credit score. And then you can use that to take the technology that was tested in Muslim countries like Palestine and bring it home and build a police and surveillance state. And so if you look at open border, closed border, that was clearly not Trp versus Biden. That was clearly a uni party, , policy of have open borders and then bring in ice, develop the privatized prison industry, develop the deportation industry, build the police and surveillance state, and then bring Palantir in. And then you lead, you have someone like Trp that delivers a narrative that they\u2019re, they\u2019re, they\u2019re doing stuff to your children and all that stuff. Now, you can make some of that true. They could deliberately bring in criminals from around the world to radicalize that theory. Like they\u2019re, they\u2019re not beyond this. These are the same people that have been killing hundreds of millions of people all around the world in order to acquire Resources and regime change governments. These are the same powers they don\u2019t have. You know that that that type of agenda. Now, the other thing is let\u2019s look at that. So that\u2019s the technical industrial complex. The military industrial complex needs that to justify war.<\/p>\n
So they nine over 11 then you had Libya war, Sudan war, Somalia, Iraq, , Lebanon, , you know, Sudan, Syria and now Iran. , and so that narrative was needed to radicalize the Americans into believing that, , you know, that this whole terrorism stuff that America and the Brits manufactured deliberately, they manufactured this, they want this. It\u2019s part of the plan. Okay. , now that\u2019s one thing. Then you have the other thing that is very interesting. If you look at the case of the UK, , so 6% of the population is Muslim, The largest demographic of immigrants is actually Nigerians, which are predominantly Christian, some Muslim Nigerians and Chinese, which are in general atheist, and Indian, which are in general Hindu with some Muslims, but they focus on the Muslims in order to have a tool and a weapon, because that weapon was built over decades from nine over 11 and prior to nine over 11. You know, that\u2019s when al Qaeda and ISIS were manufactured by the West, , via Saudi and Israel in order to have terrorism to justify this change. , now there\u2019s another change that\u2019s happening. So that\u2019s the military industrial complex gets their war. The, the technical industrial complex gets their police and surveillance state Pre-crime arrest Palantir AI, social credit scores, digital ID, central bank. Digital currencies, stablecoins, do you know all of that stuff? All of that good stuff that we got coming.<\/p>\n
But then the financial industrial complex has a really interesting situation. I believe right now that the fic is, , asset stripping America while they prepare for Multi-polarity and they\u2019re building global financial centers that had to partner with sovereign wealth funds. The largest source of sovereign wealth funds were those that control the strategic ports and strategic energy. So in the case of Europe, you had Norway, in the case of Asia, you had Singapore, China, , as the main as the main players, but a massive amount of it was concentrated in the Middle East, what used to be known as West Asia. So now let\u2019s look at this. You\u2019ve got let\u2019s look at all the different ports that are important in a multi-polar world and the largest sources of LNG, which is going to power all this AI and robotics. They\u2019re all a massive chunk of it is controlled by Muslim countries. So you\u2019ve got Yemen with the Houthis there. , you\u2019ve got North Africa, which has, you know, , , Muslim populations. You\u2019ve got the GCC, see Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, various other, , countries. , and then you\u2019ve got the most strategic port into Asia, which is Singapore, non-Muslim, but Indonesia and Malaysia. So in this world that\u2019s being built as a result of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, there\u2019s a massive Muslim, you know, Muslim countries that go from, , sectarian countries which are divide and conquer operations to secular ones like Indonesia and Malaysia to, you know, more like monarchies, , and, , and then revolutionary ones as well.<\/p>\n
So you have this complete spectr of governance structures within these different Muslim populations. What was really interesting about the UK is that when they regime changed and did some tax policies that led to the a massive chunk of millionaires and billionaires leaving the UK, just like they\u2019re doing in the Netherlands right now. They all went to UAE. So the the largest recipient of those Brits was a Muslim country. So the net beneficiary of this were these Muslim countries that are building the remnants of the wealth from the previous colonies and getting them to relocate to their country while they build out these new alternative financial systems, financial rails, and reset the world order. And so is it possible that a country could be anti-Muslim but also pro-muslim at the same time? Well, UAE is exactly that country, and there is significant evidence that there was a network of NGOs and private companies that were funding, you know, many of these different fake mosque structures, which were just political entities in order to manufacture this narrative. And so, remember, separate the religion from the OP. These are psychological operations.<\/p>\n
So let\u2019s look at this.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s look at this. We got about five minutes left. There\u2019s so much stuff I want to talk to you about still. So, Simon, for 30 years. Okay. We\u2019re going to the post Soviet period. The the West believed ideology had replaced civilization. We had liberal democracy, a globalization. Markets are supposed to dissolve these ancient identities. But if you look at the world today, religion, civilization, historical memory. All of this stuff is returning to the to the center of world politics. For example, China speaks in civilizational terms. Russia does. To India. The Islamic world increasingly does. So has the West completely misunderstood or misinterpreted the century we have entered? Are we moving from the age of ideologies back to the age of civilizations?<\/p>\n
The ideology is for the people below the financial industrial complex. The financial industrial complex has one religion capital, money, profits, revenue. They will do anything in order to maximize those matrices, including making you believe that your government\u2019s in charge, your media is independent, your vote matters, and the ideology is what\u2019s actually happening here. They will weaponize all of those tools in order to have give you a full sense of the world when really every type of governance structure, from democracy to absolute monarchy to communism to capitalism, ended up with those that control the capital, controlling the people. And the rest is just, , the, the fake narrative of communism versus capitalism. When China is so far from communism and America is so far from capitalism is just a divide and conquer operation in order to justify the Cold War. And remember who funded the Cold War? Well, 1917 remember that year where the Balfour Declaration and the British Empire and the Rothschilds started partnering with the Zionists in order to create Israel to destabilize the Middle East? They also funded the Bolsheviks that overthrew the Russian saw and replaced it with the Communist Manifesto, a Western ideology of Karl Marx, and installed it into the Soviet Union and Russia. The same Wall Street that was funding fascism that manufactured the Weimar Republic and funded Hitler in order to create the fascist uprising that led to World War Two. The same brothers, the Warburgs that were on the governor of the Federal Reserve as well as the Reichsbank that manufactured the disaster that created the Bank for International Settlements. And so capital has no ideology, but they have useful idiots everywhere. This isn\u2019t to diminish ideology. This is to say they will weaponize ideology. And if you follow the money, which is what I spent the last 25 years of my life doing, you\u2019ll find out that is actually the biggest indicator. And what capital flows tell you is opposite to what politicians are telling you and what the media needs you to believe.<\/p>\n
So, Simon, let\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Do a final round, rapid, a rapid fire, one word or short answers. Most dangerous country.<\/p>\n
. Ukraine.<\/p>\n
Israel.<\/p>\n
Oh, most.<\/p>\n
Definitely. In terms of.<\/p>\n
Yeah. Most. But I do.<\/p>\n
Believe I\u2019ll give a quick answer. I do believe Israel is being privatized and acquired by transnational capital. And you are meant to believe they\u2019re more powerful than they are. They\u2019re not as powerful as they make you believe.<\/p>\n
Most undervalued asset.<\/p>\n
, I would say Bitcoin and self-custody where you\u2019re running a node. , and you own the keys.<\/p>\n
Gold or Bitcoin.<\/p>\n
, I like both, but I\u2019ve got significantly higher percentage allocated towards Bitcoin.<\/p>\n
Dollar in ten years. What does it look like.<\/p>\n
In ten years? I think it may be it\u2019s weaker than gold and weaker than Bitcoin. It may be on par with DXY. But foreign countries in a multi-polar world will outperform the dollar.<\/p>\n
China or America.<\/p>\n
in terms of the next empire I think China would I want to live there. Well, I lived in Hong Kong for several years. , I think they are two of the same, at least in China. You know, who\u2019s in charge in America, you don\u2019t know who\u2019s in charge. And they\u2019re partnered right now, , to create this technical police and surveillance state.<\/p>\n
Will Europe recover?<\/p>\n
, , no. Europe\u2019s going to get worse and worse and worse. It doesn\u2019t get better. Same with the UK AI bubble. , we are in an AI bubble, but AI will still change the world, but I think it will be the second wave of investors that control the most important grids of the AI data centers. This round will probably get rekt, and after the lock in periods, I\u2019m sure the VCs are out.<\/p>\n
Quant computing.<\/p>\n
, yeah. I mean, quant is the the one world government that\u2019s going to be controlling all this AI and robotics.<\/p>\n
And finally, one prediction. Nobody believes today.<\/p>\n
That Israel doesn\u2019t rule the world and that it will be acquired by the Gulf countries, and Palestine will have a state, and eventually there\u2019ll be an Arab majority, and all the radical Zionists will just go somewhere else. , and it turns out that, , yeah, Israel doesn\u2019t rule the world.<\/p>\n
And, , we\u2019re out of time. But before we go, , how can we follow you? Your stuff is amazing. And I want people to listen to you, read your stuff, read your books, and follow your advice. The floor is yours.<\/p>\n
Yeah. So I give real time updates on Twitter. Sorry. X at Simon Dixon Twitter when it was called Twitter. Yeah. , I also, , go live once a week on my YouTube channel at Simon Dixon 21. , I talk between everything that happened that week for like 2 to 4 hours. , and I follow the money and then I analyze what I got wrong and then project what I think is going to happen. , and then if you don\u2019t have time for that, I created a structure on Simon dixon.com where it pulls all those long, it creates five minute videos, 30 minute videos, blog smaries, , and a community of people. , but I don\u2019t sell anything. No upsell, no sponsorship, no monetization. , I live what I teach and I try to help people get more sovereign.<\/p>\n
Simon, thanks.<\/p>\n
So much for your time again, I love your work. And for everyone who\u2019s watching us, it\u2019s a lot of people going to watch the show. Absolutely. You must follow Simon Dixon. Simon, thanks again. We\u2019d love to have you back sometime in the future.<\/p>\n
Thanks for having me. We could have gone on forever.<\/p>\n
We could have. And we\u2019ll do that next time. Take care. Bye bye. Bye.<\/p>\n
Bye. [<\/i> Locked Content]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6476,"featured_media":79806,"template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"de_tipo_contenido":[30],"de_topico":[41,44,46],"de_idioma":[],"class_list":["post-79803","de_contenido","type-de_contenido","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","de_tipo_contenido-entrevista","de_topico-economia-finanzas","de_topico-gran-reseteo","de_topico-poderes-sombra"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/de_contenido\/79803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/de_contenido"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/de_contenido"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6476"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/de_contenido\/79803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":80063,"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/de_contenido\/79803\/revisions\/80063"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79806"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"de_tipo_contenido","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/de_tipo_contenido?post=79803"},{"taxonomy":"de_topico","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/de_topico?post=79803"},{"taxonomy":"de_idioma","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estulin.media\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/de_idioma?post=79803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}